- Crop / use
- Corn
- Research
- 5 linked sources
- Production options
- Conventional
What the research measured
In 35 Minnesota locations from 2014 to 2018, polymer-coated urea yielded more than urea 26% of the time for corn following corn and 28% for corn following soybean, and never reduced yield relative to urea; fall-applied ESN beat fall urea about 25% of the time. On a sandy loam near Becker, Minnesota (2014–15) the advantage was 39 bu/ac at 120 lb N/ac, while the same treatments on fine-textured southern Minnesota soils showed no difference. A three-year Iowa study found an ESN advantage in one of nine site-years, and a four-year Wisconsin irrigated-sand study averaged 185 bu/ac for pre-plant ESN against 159 for pre-plant urea and 189 for split-sidedressed ammonium sulfate.
Minnesota land-grant trials at 35 locations over five years plus the Becker sandy-loam site, a four-year University of Wisconsin irrigated-sand study (2003–06), and NDSU’s regional summary of Iowa, Nebraska and Michigan trials. The manufacturer’s pages returned 403 and 404 and are not cited.5 independent sources.What it is. Urea granules sealed in a flexible polymer coating: water diffuses in, dissolves the urea, and the N solution diffuses back out at a rate set by soil temperature and moisture. It carries 44% N against 46% for urea, is broadcast alone or blended with urea before or at planting, and the Wisconsin authors describe release as typically complete about 6 weeks after application.
Study conditions and limitations
- Soil texture decides much of the response: the 39 bu/ac Becker advantage was on sandy loam, and the same treatments on fine-textured soils in southern Minnesota in 2014 and 2015 showed no yield difference between ESN and urea.
- Timing matters: Minnesota found a consistent corn yield increase and reduced N loss only with ESN in the pre-plant application; fall ESN out-yielded fall urea about 25% of the time and, averaged over the study, yielded less than spring pre-plant urea.
- Release is temperature-driven: ESN held at a constant 59°F for 40 days released only 29% of its N.
- In Wisconsin’s heavy-leaching 2004 season, split-sidedressed ammonium sulfate yielded 196 bu/ac against 167 for pre-plant ESN; the authors conclude that relying on pre-plant ESN as a general practice carries risk of reduced performance in wet years.
- Other Iowa work (2013–14, two locations) found no agronomic or N-use-efficiency benefit from ESN compared with urea, and Michigan blend-ratio trials showed few corn yield differences among ESN:urea ratios.
- With low loss potential there is little to protect: the first year of Minnesota’s new study (the 2021 drought) showed little or no difference between treatments. Damaged coatings release immediately; Minnesota suggests soaking 100 granules in room-temperature water for 24 hours, and if five dissolve roughly 5% of the product is damaged.
Read the sources · 5
- High nitrogen fertilizer prices: Is now the time to try polymer-coated urea? ↗
Across 35 Minnesota locations (2014–18), polymer-coated urea had a yield advantage over urea 26% of the time for corn following corn and 28% for corn following soybean, and never reduced yields relative to urea even though most sites had high N-loss potential. Near Becker (2014–15) the advantage on sandy loam was 39 bu/ac; the 2021 drought year showed little or no difference.
- Are controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer products worth the cost? ↗
ESN held at 59°F for 40 days released only 29% of its N. Both sources at 120 lb N/ac in spring, ESN out-yielded urea by 39 bu/ac on Becker sandy loam, equivalent to 200 lb N/ac of pre-plant urea, while the same treatments on fine-textured southern Minnesota soils showed no yield difference. ESN costs $0.16 to $0.20 more per pound.
- Should corn growers consider polymer-coated urea? ↗
Compared with uncoated urea, ESN in the pre-plant application gave a consistent corn yield increase and lower N loss; fall-applied ESN increased yield only about 25% of the time versus fall urea and, averaged over the study, yielded less than spring pre-plant urea. A seven-year southwest Minnesota study found split application no better than pre-plant.
- Polymer-Coated Urea (ESN) for Corn ↗
On irrigated Plainfield loamy sand at Hancock, WI (2003–06), pre-plant ESN averaged 185 bu/ac and 44% fertilizer-N recovery against 159 bu/ac and 19% for pre-plant urea; split-sidedressed ammonium sulfate averaged 189 bu/ac. In the wet 2004 season pre-plant ESN yielded 167 against 141 for pre-plant urea and 196 for split ammonium sulfate.
- Nitrogen Extenders and Additives for Field Crops ↗
A three-year Iowa study at two locations showed a corn yield advantage for ESN over urea in only one of nine site-years, and a 2013–14 Iowa study found no agronomic or N-use-efficiency benefit. A 2009–11 Nebraska study on irrigated coarse soil found ESN applied shortly after planting consistently better than UAN; Michigan blend-ratio trials (2011–13) showed few yield differences.
Before you buy, ask
- What did my soil test show, and did the cited studies respond at similar levels?
- What rate, source, and timing were tested, and what did the untreated check receive?
- How does the price per pound of nutrient compare with the sources I already use?
Record
- Sources checked
- October 12, 2026. Every figure shown is printed on the linked page; unit conversions are noted on the chart.
- Company response
- None yet. Nutrien (ESN) can send corrections, additional trials, or a statement; it is published here, labelled, and never edits the research summary. Send a correction →